The Castle Doctrine Forums

Discuss the massively-multiplayer home defense game.

You are not logged in.

#101 Re: Main Forum » A few things id like to say after returning to TCD + request for Jason » 2014-09-11 07:03:56

wow

A house can last that long? That is so not right. Steins house is just a crappy dual combo lock that wuldnt have lasted 2 weeks during the heyday of the castle doctrine. I was likely the one hitting your house continuously, almost every 2 hours for a while there. I cracked the first lock but not the second as you say. I would not be surprised if i was solely responsible for all the "hitting" your house has been receiving.

When you burn value like you say you do, that makes it completely pointless in trying to rob you. Thats why you have lasted so long and why the game economy is fucked atm with no circulation of wealth. And i dont want ur paintings.... they are literally WORTHLESS now there are so few players. I wanted your cash so i could make my own new house that ive designed.

I dont get your sense of prestige... no one gives a shit about ur paintings anymore bro. You should be putting your design to the ultimate test by letting its wealth accumulate. That is exactly what i intended to do with the new design i have cooked up.

I might just wait for the reboot, but i have some reservations about that too.

Hope your paintings keep you happy as your going to be forever alone in that house with no cash, constant changes and lame combo locks.

#102 Re: Main Forum » Reboot News plus open call for iPhone Beta testers » 2014-09-11 06:02:50

plz dont put a pause mode in. That sounds so exploitable.

What does the new "safe" look like? I hope it carries the same "sight-value" as the existing one...

ie: "OMG ITS THE SAFE"

not: "omg its the computer terminal.... great"

#103 Main Forum » A few things id like to say after returning to TCD + request for Jason » 2014-09-08 06:46:40

Amatiel
Replies: 47

Im back!

First of all... JASON! PLEASE remove chills altogether. The following should explain why.

Already im frustrated at the type of behavior exhibited by the core/top end player base.
If your going to make a house so weak that it only takes a few suicide scouts for me to crack it...

BE A MAN and take it on the chin!

DONT commit suicide in one of your alt account's houses to preserve your wealth, dump your wealth or babysit your house for 2+ hrs. I mean really... there must be only 10 active players left and you lot are still (fucking STILL) carrying on with this bullshit that drove away the entire player base.

I thought the 2 hour chills would add some life to the game, but it's STILL not enough, and im now going to have to start using multiple accounts. Again. Because that is the ONLY way to get anywhere in this game. Im wont be using extra accounts to accumulate wealth, but to prevent the target house from spiriting away their wealth before I can make the robbery.

Ive broken through to extremely close to where the vault is on a number of the top 6 or so houses (excluding Hood's house which has been robbed by someone else) and EVERY time immediately before my final run, the house disappears (Lee Richard Flinn and Edward John Phillips for example) or loses massive value (Sandy Clarence Stein).

Now there is simply no way that both Phillips and Flinn were both robbed immediately before me... They disappeared way too quickly after me coming so close to the vault. As for stein, Im DEFINITELY going multiple account on your ass just to spite you. Your value PLUMMETED from 50K to 10K and with no other houses worth robbing at the time, there is no other explanation for this wealth reduction than the blatant dumping of it, and I had only cracked the first of your two massive combo locks.

Its too hard to get ahead - these houses were each TERRIBLY weak designs (for top end houses) and only takes 4-5 runs to crack but despite this i dont get enough time to make the heist because of the above behavior.

So this is TCD these days... the bad players now rule at the top after driving away the talent and originality with their tiresome and un-sportsman like conduct.

Please remove chills completely to encourage more circulation of what little wealth is left in TCD.

#104 Re: Main Forum » Solo Player Non-Commit House Designs (For Cullman's Game) » 2014-05-28 08:39:36

those designs freelove....

I reckon i have robbed you quite a few times lol they are very familiar

#105 Re: Main Forum » Who all is still active » 2014-05-28 08:19:00

You are dead right it would be very hard not to abuse it AND having that 2nd account on any level, still detracts from the experience of the game imo. Even if one just uses a second account so they dont have to risk their main.... i believe they would be much more inclined to risk their main if he/she did not have a second account and we would see many more large bounties drop UNINTENTIONALLY... as most are intentionally dropped into an alt or friends account.

I have no experience in programming but the best solution ive seen is to block visibility of houses with the same IP as you. I would love to know how hard this would be to implement. There are work arounds im aware of that could cheat this but it becomes a matter of know how and effort.

This is the ONLY thing i want changed in this game.

I was initially interested in your reboot cullman but for me personally you are changing to much of what i liked and you seem to be dumbing it down to gain numbers/sales in a fashion comparable to what CA did to Rome 2, or other games that are dumbed down for console ports etc.

#106 Re: Main Forum » Who all is still active » 2014-05-28 06:33:05

When i talk of multiple account users, Im talking about the guys who use them to farm thousands upon thousands in a very short time frame, usually wrecking low value starter houses in the process, Using a second account (or using a friend) to help scout a little bit or use as a genuine second account for a different house design i think is fine. Even a daily drop of five saws into your main is OK and isnt going to totally fuck the game imo. Its the guys who would take a secondary/tertiary/more account and attain a high bounty by wife/child bashing in starter houses (or even in houses owned by their other accounts) then suiciding in someone elses house leaving sometimes up to 4-5K in some poor bastards starter house which they had just figured out how to solve before hanging themselves in front of the vault and promptly collecting the huge sum with their main account.

Kinda poor explanation of how they do it but u guys get the point, the guy i came across who was doing this, shlam16, was doing it on a massive scale, likely in a more efficient manner than described above. He would then rob other people with this huge wealth by repeated brute force attempts where he could afford to use a tool for every step he took as an extra safety precaution. I feel sorry for the people he cheated this way. After robbing people he sank all his cash into paintings knowing he would be less of a target with a lower value (no point dropping 30k into a brute force to rob a 5k house) and he could raise cash very quickly anyway if he needed to. This guy had the fucking temerity to trumpet his achievements on the forums, conversing with the people he robbed who all congratulated him in good form without knowing they were cheated.

In the end, myself and others proved he was an outright cheat and exploiter of the worst kind, and posted info of his house on the forums until we cracked his house. He then suicided in one of his co conspirators houses after i revealed his vault location but was one tool short of robbing him.

This, specifically, is the kind of behavior that drove people away. This is why starter houses were being trashed, frustrating and angering new players, enraging people with medium to high value houses who returned to a bunch of security tapes of someone who purposefully keeps their value low somehow brute forcing them with gargantuan and inexplicable wealth, yet you have never seen this individuals wealth above 20k.

If i come across this again, I will begin assaulting their house and posting it on the forums because this is a good fucking game, and it has been tainted by deeply insecure people with inflated egos based on falsity. You can blame the design of the game all you want but a viable solution seems nigh impossible, its' way easier to blame 5% of the population for being twats.

#107 Re: Main Forum » Who all is still active » 2014-05-25 06:00:27

Ive just returned after a couple months break...

I needed to build up resistance and acceptance (kinda like you resist and accept getting HIV) of the cancerous multiple account cheating scum who ruined this game.

FIY THAT is what drove myself and MANY others away, it was not because of the nature of the game as it was intended.

Having just read through the forums to see what has been happening, Cullman you have my respect and kudos to you for your efforts.

Mmaster and the rest of those self justifying assholes can go to hell, and I will make it my life's mission to kill your house if I come into contact with a multiple account user.

Just like I did with Shlam16's house.

#108 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-23 01:03:32

Lord0fHam wrote:

And by the way guys, all you proof was based on the fact that he went from a low value house to a high value house quickly. That happens all the time. If you spend a bunch of money and drop back into the 5-10k range, you can easily go back up to 20k in a day.

The fact that right before in both cases someone with a decent bounty robbed the place.... (so they knew how to get to vault) only to return and hang himself in the door... no way buddy thats more than coincidence.

Perhaps you have just got too much of an optimistic and innocent heart or dont realize the significance of these actions.

#109 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 23:42:12

Lord0fHam wrote:
shlam16 wrote:

Ooh looky here, Amatiel is the first person to ever find (not rob) my vault, entirely through the advanced knowledge of multiple robbers and about 10 attempts himself alone. He is broke now, so I think it is a perfect time to retire my house undefeated. Paintings and cash go to my brother, whether he tries to protect them is entirely up to him from here, I'd rather they be sent back to the auction house to be honest.

Here is a look at what none of you could ever crack. This is more for you Stefan, Lord0fHam and Gyuri, the 3 people who have had decent looks around, but never solved it. I'll describe the various traps if anyone wants to know.

http://castledraft.com/editor/pmD0XT

Well shlam16, I'm really sorry to see it has come to this. I hope you can still enjoy the game and rise to the top again. That is one great house and I still can't even figure it out. Maybe I'll be able to pick up some cool paintings in the auction house.

Im really starting to suspect that you are either his brother or someone who sympathises with blatant cheating. You are the only one who is still defending him.

#110 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 23:35:41

Actually, it was 4 attempts total (aside from poking my head in with no tools) AND I did it alone, the information that others provided while welcome, did not reveal anything I either didnt already know or revealed areas of your house that were not needed to be revealed.

It was just a giant conventional double combo lock, with pet herding exercises built into it. Why would anyone try to crack that when it is far cheaper and easier to brute force it like i did?

It can be brute forced for 12.6K but it took roughly 20K to discover where the vault was, which was in a predictable location. One needs to strike a balance between brute force protection and complexity. This was too complex and super vulnerable to brute forcing.

Justice won the day! Let this be a lesson to anyone who thinks they can blatantly cheat and not suffer consequences.

#111 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 22:08:16

In the interests of the community I present you with Mr Howards vault.

http://castledraft.com/editor/CxERvF

If I had one more ladder the sentence would have been passed then and there.

Ill give you guys the chance to get to him before I do. This is after all, only fair to give the many people who he has robbed using his exploit a chance for justice.

I expect a massive retaliation of some sorts, more than what he has tried thus far but know that i took one for the team. Ill go down fighting but please... remember me :'(

#112 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 20:59:34

To rob him you would need to brute force him to some extent, you will not be able to beat him with 2k of tools any time soon. too many combo locks, and its too easy for him to change them

Or are you talking about commiting seppuku with an established house/character?

#113 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 20:52:40

Lord0fHam wrote:

I'm not saying that either of the two (dual accounts, cooperative forum robbing) are ok. they are both stupid and ruin the game for other people. In regards to "protecting himself" by keeping his value low, there is nothing stopping you from robbing him. If you want the paintings which have a LOW estimate of 600k value, then you rob him. If you are worried about not getting a cash return, then rob someone else. It doesn't impact you at all what he does in regards to his own wealth.

He has now made TWO brute force attempts against me with that "low worth" your talking about. He is an unfair threat to everyone because hes a serial exploiter. It surprises me that you cant see that.

#114 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 20:39:07

Lord of ham, surely you dont view exploiting using two accounts as a lesser evil compared to cooperative forum robbing?

Two people now have said they have witnessed Mr howard using this exploit.

In fact He has made two brute force attempts against my house now and one can guess hows hes getting the cash to do that easily enough.

We have to take him down... for justice!

Ill be contributing to the map again shortly dustman.

#115 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 08:56:46

shlam16 wrote:

Amatiel you need to get a grip and stop trying to play the martyr card when you are the expletive who is in the wrong here. My brother does in fact have an account, and we frequently do scout together, but this nonsense you are spouting is simply that. Nonsense. I also love your "proof beyond a doubt" too, you would make a great scientist. Do you realise how many houses I stick my head into when I'm online? All of them, that's how many. But since I stick my head into a house and find a vault staring me in the face, I am to be condemned for taking it?

Also, how about you get your story straight. My wealth was sitting at 9k when I came back online. I promptly robbed some low hanging fruit (Charles David Clark had like $4800 alone) and got up to about 16k before spending around 10k in your house. What a waste of space it is. I mean literally. Yawning chasms of pits, concrete/pit/concrete/pit, no creativity whatsoever. Unlike some of the more petty and spiteful players in this game, I will not post the map of your house. I don't want anyone else getting what is mine. Expect to see me back again shortly, if you actually payed attention to the broken maps you would notice just how often free money shows up in them. Here's a free tip, map out Patrick Connells house and some of the other obviously broken ones, those are abandoned goldmines.

Edit: Well that last attempt was a waste of money, I wasted too much time in this forum and forgot to buy crowbars. Oh well, see you tomorrow.

I am familiar with most of the broken houses and they very seldom have more than 1-2k above their broken vault state. Scouting together is fine imo, you take it too far tho:

I am accusing you of having ur "bro" attain a large bounty then die in someones low level/broken house so you can come along with your main account and collect the lot. Looks like you profit 5k each time you do this. This takes it too far and i hadn't until now thought of someone making cash like that.

I have been watching your wealth levels closely over the past week and there is simply no way your wealth levels can be explained any other way, especially with your extremely cautious and expensive method of robbing people where you refuse to stand on electric floor that isnt cut first instead of checking for clocks the cheap way like the rest of us who don't have oodles of cash from exploiting the game.

I will enjoy watching your repeated failed attempts at breaking my house. Perhaps after many more attempts you will come to understand it's cleverness?

#116 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 08:22:25

StefanLindskog wrote:

Hand on heart, one account. I've accepted santa runs from friends after they've died, pointed people in the direction of a vulnerable house and killed Costanzo in the house of a friend. My moral high ground feels firm enough to me. If shlam's success is due to dual accounts, then shame on him. The operative word is IF.

Well Dustman's two pics prove he has done it at least once.

And it also explains his erratic wealth levels

#117 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 08:05:26

And surprise surprise Mr Howard has paid me a visit, shortly after his value of 4k shot up progressively to a total value (including tools he took to my house) of nearly 20k in no time at all.

Hes gonna have to exploit his second account a whole lot more to crack my house though but still, this is the first time I can look at a certain behavior and say that is where i personally draw the line.

To me, using a second account to generate large amounts of wealth for your first using an exploit breaks the game and is cheating. Im even fine with two friends working together to scout a house but this takes it too far imo.

Well i wondered how long it would take people to break "the castle doctrine", its so prolific now that its arguably unplayable as i refuse to compete by following suit.

#118 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 07:45:04

CircleOfSorrow wrote:
GotABigTrap wrote:

yeah its obvious lots of people use duel accounts.  I make a starter house and within 2 minutes a person comes in and dies on purpose leaving a 5000 bounty.  10 seconds later another comes to collect it.  I suppose that they could just be friends though.

I'm a bit slow...help me out...why don't they just suicide in their own alt account?...

Chills stops them from doing it in their own house more than once a day.

To do it more than once a day they kill their 2nd account in someone elses house which then allows your main account to rob that house shortly afterwards. So they are doing it over and over again.

I always suspected that Mr Howard was doing this, as they way he described he gets his insane amount of riches so fast didnt make sense. He is not the only one though, many people are doing it and I believe it is mainly a side effect of the game slowing down so much now since steam release. After 25K Value, you can count the robber deaths you get per day on one hand. It's too slow and its becoming more like one of those games where you play it away from the keyboard so to speak. And its getting worse.

Perhaps Jason should look at reintroducing the salary system where you earn so much per day on top of bounties. I dont know what the solution is (besides another large influx of players), but it does need addressing.

#119 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 06:30:05

42dustman wrote:
StefanLindskog wrote:

I don't approve of exposing shlam's house like that - at all. I have a more complete map than you guys do, and would never post it here. Shame on you dustman and Amatiel.

EDIT: If shlam's house fall because of this it was a collaborative forum brute force job (CFBFJ) and won't count towards any honor.

Who's to approve what is and isn't a honorable strategy in TCD? All kinds of "low" strategies are used extensively in this game: Clocks, wireless transmission (before the bug was fixed), magic dances, comb locks behind commit gates, use of superior wealth to brute force possible threats out of the picture, scouting and transferring money with dual accounts, destroying poor houses just for the lulz, artificially keeping your wealth low to avoid attention, constantly reseting the death counter to make the house look harmless to noobs, hoarding paintings so no one else can have them, etc...

Talking of being honorable in this game is like talking of being hygienic in the sewers. hmm

And by the way, Shlam also does most of those things I mentioned:

http://i.imgur.com/LQqAGyN.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/4L2VbH3.jpg

Well that proves beyond a doubt that hes using dual accounts.

That moral high ground shlam and stefan are standing on is looking REAL shaky now

Come on guys no one likes a hypocrite. I would feel honored that my house was worthy of such attention.

#120 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 04:34:32

StefanLindskog wrote:

In order for robbing him to be a point, you have to share his opinion about paintings being the endgame. The fact that you want to rob him "just 'cause" seems petty to me. Him playing the way he does is within the boundaries of the game. You exposing his house to everyone outside the game is not. Who's the next CFBFJ-target after shlam? I don't like it at all.

EDIT: I realize that seeing shlam as a threat is a legitimate reason for taking his house too. Regardless of which reason for attacking him you choose, the cost will be justified. He took me down at a considerable loss for being a threat mostly, but also for having a nice painting that would complete his collection.

That is mostly why i want to rob him, threat factor.

And again he is only CFBFJ vulnerable due to his style of play

Why is this outside the boundaries of the game?

One could argue the same for dual accounts, people working together on any level and finding out what your name is etc. What gives you the right to decide what is 'within the boundaries of the game'?

You are entitled to your opinion, mine is as far as i'm concerned he entirely brought this on himself by not keeping a low profile and making it public that he will eliminate anyone who he views as a threat in addition to what i said above about how he keeps his value so low.

This is not the first time someone has been taken down by CFBFJ, in fact it was attempted for the exact same reason last time. The community riled against what they saw as a common threat.

Ill roll out the welcome mat for you Shlam, best of luck to you.

#121 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 02:31:01

StefanLindskog wrote:

I don't approve of exposing shlam's house like that - at all. I have a more complete map than you guys do, and would never post it here. Shame on you dustman and Amatiel.

EDIT: If shlam's house fall because of this it was a collaborative forum brute force job (CFBFJ) and won't count towards any honor.

Well really he has brought this on himself

He keeps his wealth so low which discourages/frustrates most serious brute force attempts but also, crucially leaves him vulnerable to "CFBFJ" as you call it.

If he kept a proper amount of cash in his vault this wouldn't happen because he could just change his house when it happens and players would be less likely to be willing to share this information.

The theme is relevant even here: Its ALWAYS your fault when you die.

#122 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 01:16:37

Id also like to add that i believe Mr Howard is about to discover the downside of not keeping a large sum of money in your vault.

Being that you cant afford to change your house in an emergency like this smile

#123 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-22 00:26:41

http://castledraft.com/editor/rubSwi

This should be the final update and amendment

The broken voltage triggered switches signify i dont know if they are inverted or not as i forgot to note that... not that its of importance.

To rob him i suggest bricking the window beneath the cat then ladder across the pit and saw your way up to the top of the map drugging the dogs as you go, his vault must be up the top of the map somewhere i reckon, try top left corner first then work ur way back to the top right corner. EDIT: It is probably actually down the bottom right or at least the right hand edge of his house. be sure to bring plenty of other tools if you do it.

Alas I have run out of cash so I leave it to you nice people to deliver the coup de grace

ADIOS Mr HOWARD! ITS BEEN NICE KNOWING YA!

This friendly neighborhood message was brought to you by Mr Coney smile

#125 Re: Main Forum » People who keep their values intentionally low » 2014-03-21 23:45:06

Wow

A picture speaks a thousand words...

This one is saying a lot, and i dont think shlam is gonna like it

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.10